It is the New Testament's ordinary word for love, and the writers filled it with the content of the cross. What it describes is something you can be commanded to do.
Agape love is the New Testament's main word for love, and what it describes is a decision you act on, not a feeling that arrives. It is the love Jesus commands, and you cannot command a feeling.
The usual definition you will hear is unconditional love, and that is close enough to be useful. But the word itself does not mean that. Agape gets its content from what God does, not from the dictionary.
That distinction matters more than it sounds, because a lot of teaching on this word claims more than the Greek will carry. We are going to walk through what it actually does, where the popular version overreaches, and what the two chapters built on it are really saying.
Greek had several words in this area and they overlap far more than the sermon version admits.
The broad, general word for love in the New Testament. Used for God's love for the world, love between believers, love of enemies, and love of husband for wife.
Not because it was a rare holy term the church discovered. It was the ordinary word available, and the writers filled it with the content of the cross.
Warm affection, friendship, fondness. The root behind Philadelphia, brotherly love.
John 3:35 says the Father loves the Son using agapao. John 5:20 says the same thing using phileo. Same relationship, same gospel, different verb.
Agape is the wide word and phileo the narrower one, but they are not sealed off from each other. Any teaching that treats them as separate grades of love is tidying up the evidence.
If you came looking for the full set, see the types of love in the Bible.
This is the part that gets left out, and leaving it out has made a lot of people trust a word instead of reading a sentence.
Agape appears all over the Greek Old Testament, and not always attached to anything good. In 2 Samuel 13, Amnon rapes his half sister Tamar. The Greek text of that chapter uses this very word for what he felt about her before he did it, and then says his hatred afterward was greater than the love with which he had loved her. That is agape, in the Bible, describing something monstrous.
Agape is a special divine word for unconditional love, different in kind from all human loving, and its presence in a verse tells you which kind is meant.
Agape is a common word that the New Testament writers loaded with meaning by pointing at Jesus. The weight comes from the cross, not from the vocabulary.
Because word study preaching has trained people to look for secret meanings in Greek instead of reading what the passage says, and it makes Scripture feel like something only an expert can open. It is not. Whenever someone tells you a Greek word secretly means something the English translation hid from you, be careful. Translators are not hiding things.
The better news is that you lose nothing by giving up the magic word. 1 John does not define agape by etymology. It points at an event: this is how we know what love is, Jesus Christ laid down His life for us. I unpack the line If love fails it was never love in its own study.
Every post here is free to read. If this one helped you, you can help keep it that way. Pick an amount and finish on Stripe's secure checkout.
Change your amount, update your card, or cancel anytime. Enter the email you give with and Stripe sends you a secure link.
Manage My Giving"Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver."2 Corinthians 9:7
Read the famous chapter again and notice what kind of words it uses. Patient. Kind. Does not envy. Does not boast. Keeps no record of wrongs. Every one of them is something you do or refuse to do.
“Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud... it keeps no record of wrongs.”
1 Corinthians 13:4 and 5Brian Peterson of Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary makes the point sharply in his commentary on the chapter. “Paul never says that such love feels good”, he writes, and he notes that the chapter gets read at weddings because it is wrongly taken as praise for romantic love.
It is not a wedding poem. It sits in the middle of a letter to a congregation that was fighting about spiritual gifts, comparing themselves to each other and humiliating poorer members at the meal. Chapter 12 is about gifts. Chapter 14 is about gifts. Chapter 13 is Paul stopping to say none of it counts without this.
What kind of words does 1 Corinthians 13 use to describe love?
Patient, kind, does not envy, does not boast, keeps no record of wrongs. The chapter never describes how love feels, because it was written to a congregation that was treating each other badly.
“Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.”
1 John 4:8This is the sentence that gives the word its content. John is not saying love is a quality God happens to have a lot of. He is saying it is what God is, so that anything claiming to be God and not looking like this is not Him.
Ben Witherington of Asbury Theological Seminary puts the implication directly in his piece on the verse, that “God is the most self-sacrificial being in the universe”. That is a claim about character, and the letter immediately turns it into a claim about you.
This is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son. The definition points at something that happened, not at a sentiment.
We love because He first loved us. The order matters. You are not generating this. You are passing on something you received.
Whoever claims to love God and hates a brother or sister is a liar. John gives you a way to check the claim, and it is not introspection.
There is no fear in love. If your picture of God leaves you afraid of Him, John says something in the picture is wrong.
More on that last point in the character of God and the fear of the Lord.
Here is the practical payoff of everything above. Jesus commands love. Love your enemies. Love one another as I have loved you. A command only makes sense if what is being asked is something you can choose.
Nobody can order you to feel warmly about a person who has hurt you. That is not available to you on demand and pretending otherwise produces liars. But you can be told to act toward them in a way that seeks their good, refuses to keep score, and does not repay what was done. That is available. That is what is being asked.
Which means the question is never do I have enough love for this person. The question is what does love do here, and then whether you will do it. Feelings often follow the action rather than leading it, and that is the ordinary experience of anybody who has cared for someone difficult for long enough.
None of this means staying in a situation that is harming you. Seeking someone's good and giving them access to you are two different things, and Scripture never confuses them. If that is the live question for you, send it to us and somebody will pray with you about it rather than hand you a verse.
For related ground, see the greatest commandment, loving your enemies, the fruit of the Spirit and forgiveness.
Agape is an ordinary Greek word that the New Testament filled with the content of the cross, and everything it describes is something you can actually go and do.
That is a normal thing to be carrying and it is worth praying about with somebody rather than alone. Send it here and someone at Sound of Heaven will pray over it. You do not have to be a member and you do not have to give details.
Agape love is the New Testament's main word for love, used over 250 times for God's love for the world, love between believers, love of enemies and love within marriage. What it describes is a chosen commitment you act on rather than a feeling that arrives. This is why Jesus can command it. Nobody can order you to feel a certain way, but you can be told to act toward somebody in a way that seeks their good.
That is a fair summary of how the New Testament uses it, but it is not what the Greek word means by itself. Agape was an ordinary word available in the language, and the writers gave it weight by pointing at what God did. 1 John does not define it by etymology. It says this is how we know what love is, Jesus Christ laid down His life for us. The content comes from the event, not the vocabulary.
Agape is the broad general word and phileo is the narrower one for warm affection and friendship, the root behind Philadelphia. But they overlap heavily and Scripture does not keep them in separate lanes. John 3:35 says the Father loves the Son using agapao, and John 5:20 says the same thing using phileo. Teaching that grades them as higher and lower kinds of love is tidying up evidence that is messier than that.
No, and this surprises people. The word appears throughout the Greek Old Testament, including in 2 Samuel 13 where it is used for what Amnon felt toward his half sister Tamar before he raped her. The text then says his hatred afterward was greater than the love with which he had loved her. The word by itself carries no guarantee, which is why the New Testament defines it by pointing at Jesus rather than at a dictionary.
No. It sits in the middle of a letter to a congregation fighting about spiritual gifts and humiliating its poorer members at the shared meal. Chapter 12 is about gifts, chapter 14 is about gifts, and chapter 13 is Paul stopping to say none of it counts without this. As Brian Peterson notes in his commentary, the chapter gets used at weddings because it is wrongly taken as praise for romantic human love, and he points out that Paul never says such love feels good.