Two Invitations, A Fire And The Roads
Notice who the first guests are. Not strangers. In verse 3 the servants go to call those who had already been invited, people who had long known the day was coming.
The invited guests would not come. The verb is about will, not schedule, and Jesus uses it again over Jerusalem in 23:37: you were not willing.
Dinner is ready. Some shrug and go off to the farm and the business. The rest seize the servants and kill them, exactly like the tenants.
The king sends troops and burns their city. Kings do not torch cities while the roast sits on the table. Jesus is stepping out of the story to say where this is headed.
The servants gather everyone they find on the main roads, both bad and good, and the hall fills.
“The king was angry, and he sent his troops and destroyed those murderers and burned their city.”
Matthew 22:7 · ESVWhich city? Everyone in that courtyard knew. Jesus names it in Matthew 23:37 as the city that kills the prophets. Within that generation, Roman soldiers did exactly what verse 7 describes. Josephus, who was there, records that Titus “gave orders to the soldiers both to burn and to plunder the city”.
Some scholars think Matthew wrote after AD 70 and shaped verse 7 in light of it. You do not have to settle that to see the point. The parable treats the burning of Jerusalem as the king's judgment on a generation that refused His Son. It is covenant history fulfilled in the first century, not a forecast of some future sorting of the human race. Jesus said it in plainer terms in Matthew 24 explained.
The first guests lost their seat by refusing it, not by failing a test. Then the doors swung open to everyone else.