A woman and a man, speaking to each other with longing and loyalty, kept in Scripture on purpose. Who wrote it, how it has been read, and what it says love actually is.
The Song of Solomon is a collection of love poetry, eight short chapters in which a young woman and the man she loves speak to each other with longing, delight and loyalty. It is about human love first, and it sits in the Bible because God thinks faithful love between two people is worth singing about.
Jewish readers heard God and Israel in it, and Christians for centuries heard Christ and the church. Both readings have a real history, and both work best when the plain reading comes first and the larger echo comes after it, not instead of it.
The rest of this study shows our work, including the parts people usually skip.
The Hebrew title is Shir HaShirim, the Song of Songs. It is the same construction as holy of holies, and it means the best song of all. Your Bible may call it the Song of Solomon or the Song of Songs. Same book.
It is poetry, and that matters more than anything else you bring to it. There is no narrator. There are voices, scenes, night searches that read like dreams, and refrains that return like a chorus. People have charted a tidy story out of it, courtship, wedding, marriage. Some of that shape is there, but many scholars think it is closer to a set of love songs held together by repeated lines than a single plot.
The woman speaks more than anyone else in the book. She opens it, she ends it, she goes looking for him at night. In an ancient text that is striking.
Like Esther, the Song does not clearly mention God. The one possible exception is a single word in 8:6, and translators split on it. We will get there.
In Jewish tradition it is one of the five scrolls read at the festivals, chanted during Passover in the spring.
Vineyards, gazelles, a walled garden, city watchmen, brothers with opinions. The poem lives among real places and real families.
The first verse reads, in most English Bibles, "The Song of Songs, which is Solomon's." That sounds like a byline. The Hebrew is less settled than the English makes it look.
Solomon's name with the small preposition le attached to the front of it.
By, for, to, belonging to, or dedicated to. Context decides, and a title line gives very little context.
Jewish and Christian tradition read it as authorship. First Kings 4:32 says Solomon's songs were 1,005, which made him the natural name to attach.
Many scholars notice parallels with Egyptian and Babylonian love poetry and features of later Hebrew, and date the writing centuries after Solomon.
One honest correction. First Kings says Solomon wrote 1,005 songs. It does not say this is one of them, and the confident tenth century date you sometimes see is a guess dressed as a fact.
Here is where we land. We do not know who held the pen, and it changes nothing about what the book is. Solomon appears inside the poem as a figure more than as the voice. The same question hangs over the other Solomon books, as we show in who wrote Ecclesiastes.
Read it as poetry, let the woman's voice lead, and hold the authorship question loosely. The book does not depend on the byline.
For most of history, most readers did not take the Song as being about a man and a woman at all. That view deserves to be heard at its strongest.
The prophets had already made the move. Hosea tells Israel's story as a marriage to an unfaithful wife. Jeremiah remembers Israel's early devotion as the love of a bride. Isaiah says God rejoices over His people like a bridegroom over his bride. When rabbis read the Song as God and Israel, they were following a method the Bible itself uses.
The Mishnah records an argument over whether the Song belonged among the sacred writings, and Rabbi Akiva answered with a line people still quote: "while all of the sacred writings are holy, the Song of Songs is the holy of holies!" You can read that saying in context in Rabbi Adam Greenwald's introduction to the Song of Songs. Christians took up the same instinct and turned it toward Christ.
The debate recorded in Mishnah Yadayim 3:5 ends with the Song treated as the holiest of the writings.
Origen wrote a commentary and homilies on the Song, hearing in the bride both the church and the individual soul longing for the Word.
Bernard of Clairvaux preached a long series of sermons on the Song and died before he finished the book.
Readers attentive to genre recover what the words say on the surface: a woman and a man, delighting in each other.
Now the other side. Nothing in the poem signals that it is an allegory. There is no interpreter, no "this means that." The body is described as a body. When every detail gets decoded into doctrine, the interpreter is writing the meaning, which is why different allegorists decode the same line in completely different ways.
Treat every line as a coded map of the spiritual life, as if desire were too embarrassing to be the subject. Or flip it and preach the book as a marriage technique manual with a checklist.
Poetry that honors desire, loyalty and delight between a woman and a man, sitting inside a Bible that already uses married love as a picture of God's love for His people.
At Sound of Heaven we read the Song of Solomon as love poetry about a woman and a man, and we think that is its first and plain meaning. We think the heavy allegorical reading, however devout, was often driven by discomfort with the body, the idea that God could not possibly want a book about this in His Scriptures. That discomfort is the error, not the poem.
We also refuse the opposite error. The Song is not a self help book, and flattening it into dating tips is as much a misreading as turning it into code.
And yet the echo is real. Because the whole Bible uses faithful marriage to picture God's covenant love, and Paul says marriage points to Christ and the church, a believer who reads this poem and finds their heart turning toward God is not wrong. They are hearing the second note. Just let the first one sound.
Every post here is free to read. If this one helped you, you can help keep it that way. Pick an amount and finish on Stripe's secure checkout.
Change your amount, update your card, or cancel anytime. Enter the email you give with and Stripe sends you a secure link.
Manage My Giving"Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver."2 Corinthians 9:7
You cannot talk honestly about this book and skip Solomon's household. Scripture does not skip it either.
He had 700 wives, who were princesses, and 300 concubines. And his wives turned away his heart.
1 Kings 11:3 · ESVThe Bible reports this. It never endorses it. Deuteronomy had warned kings not to multiply wives, and First Kings tells the story as a slow disaster: foreign altars, a divided heart, a kingdom that splits after his death. Solomon is not a model husband. The fuller history is in why Solomon had so many wives, and the harder question of how his life ended in did Solomon go to heaven.
The poem that carries his name points the other way. In chapter 6 the man mentions queens and concubines, and then says of the woman he loves, "My dove, my perfect one, is the only one." The whole palace in the background, and one person in the foreground.
Then look at the ending. In 8:11 Solomon has an enormous vineyard he rents out for silver. In 8:12 comes the reply: "My vineyard, my very own, is before me; you, O Solomon, may have the thousand." Some readers hear a gentle jab there, the lover telling the king he can keep his thousand, this one is not for sale. That is a reading, not a certainty, but it fits the chapter well.
When Jesus is asked about marriage in Matthew 19, He does not point to Solomon. He goes back to the beginning: the two become one flesh. The Song sounds far more like that than like the palace.
The Song carries Solomon's name and quietly refuses his way of loving. One, not a thousand. Given, not bought.
I adjure you, O daughters of Jerusalem, by the gazelles or the does of the field, that you not stir up or awaken love until it pleases.
Song of Solomon 2:7 · ESVNotice who is talking. This is the woman, speaking to the young women of the city. It is wisdom learned from inside her own longing, and she says it three times.
She has just described being held by the one she loves, and at the height of it she warns her friends.
She has searched the city at night and found him. Again the charge.
The last time, shorter, without the gazelles.
"Until it pleases" means until love is ready. You cannot force it or rush it. Stirring up desire before there is a covenant to hold it is like lighting a fire in a room with no fireplace. The fire is good. The room is the problem. That is where the Song's wisdom meets what Scripture teaches about sex before marriage, and it says it without a single threat.
Now the correction, and I mean it strongly. This verse has been used on teenagers, girls in particular, as if desire were dirty and their bodies a danger. She is not ashamed of what she feels. She celebrates it for eight chapters. Her warning is about timing, not shame, and a church that uses her words to make young people afraid of being human has turned a love poem into a weapon.
How many times does the woman give the "do not awaken love" charge?
It is a refrain, repeated in 2:7, 3:5 and 8:4. The first two add "by the gazelles or the does of the field." Each time it follows a moment of intense longing or closeness.
Maybe you are single and tired of waiting for a love that has not come. Maybe you grew up hearing this verse as a threat and still carry the shame. Maybe you are married and your marriage feels a long way from this poem.
None of that disqualifies you from what this book is about. God is not embarrassed by your longing, and He is not finished with your story. If you want someone to pray with you, send us a prayer request and a real person will.
Everything in the Song climbs toward two verses near the end.
Set me as a seal upon your heart, as a seal upon your arm, for love is strong as death, jealousy is fierce as the grave. Its flashes are flashes of fire, the very flame of the LORD. Many waters cannot quench love, neither can floods drown it. If a man offered for love all the wealth of his house, he would be utterly despised.
Song of Solomon 8:6, 7 · ESVA seal in the ancient world was your signature, pressed into clay or wax to mark something as yours. She asks to be worn that way, over his heart and on his arm, inside and out, private and public.
Then she says love is strong as death. Death does not let go and does not negotiate, and real love holds on like that. The jealousy in the next line is not insecurity or control. It is the fierce refusal to share what was promised to one person.
The phrase "the very flame of the LORD" is the one place where God may be named in the whole book. The Hebrew word ends with a short form of the divine name. The ESV reads it as God's own flame, the NIV as "a mighty flame." Either way, this love burns with something from beyond the two people holding it.
And the last line is quiet. You cannot buy love. Put that next to a palace of political marriages and it lands hard.
Desire, a longing, a strong turning of the will toward someone.
After the fall: "Your desire shall be contrary to your husband, but he shall rule over you." Desire bent into struggle and rule.
Sin crouching at Cain's door, with its desire for him.
"I am my beloved's, and his desire is for me." The same word, and now nobody rules. Desire flows toward her, freely given.
It is easy to miss in English. The word the fall bent out of shape shows up in the Song made straight again. Love the way it was meant to work is still possible.
For the wider vocabulary of love, see the 7 types of love in the Bible, what love is and eros, the Greek word for romantic desire.
Love that is sealed, that holds like death, that water cannot put out and money cannot buy. The Song calls that a flame of the LORD.
So is the Song of Solomon about a man and a woman or about Jesus? The plain answer first: a man and a woman, and God put it in the Bible because He calls that love good.
But read chapter 8 again with Jesus in view. Love as strong as death. Jesus walked into death itself, and death could not hold Him. The floods did not drown Him. Nobody bought that love. It was given.
That is not a secret code hidden in the poem. That is where the whole arc of Scripture goes. Paul calls marriage a profound mystery that points to Christ and the church, which is why the New Testament can speak of the church as the bride of Christ. Married love at its best is a small, real picture of that, and in Jesus it is not a future hope. It is the life of the Kingdom right now. God is love, and He has shown us exactly what that looks like.
For related reading, see the purpose of marriage, agape love and what we believe. And if you are on Long Island, come visit us on a Sunday.
The Song of Solomon is love poetry about a woman and a man, kept in Scripture because God calls faithful desire good, and read in the light of Jesus it points to a love that death could not hold, water could not quench and money could never buy.
Whether you are single, engaged, married or still sorting out what you were taught, send it in and someone at Sound of Heaven will walk through it with you.
The Song of Solomon is love poetry. Across eight short chapters a young woman and the man she loves speak to each other with longing, delight and loyalty, and the woman's voice leads most of the way. Its plain subject is human love between a woman and a man. Jewish tradition also heard God's love for Israel in it, and Christians heard Christ and the church. Those echoes are real, but they work best after the plain reading, not in place of it.
Tradition credits King Solomon, and First Kings 4:32 says he wrote 1,005 songs. But the Hebrew of the first verse uses a small preposition that can mean by, for, to or dedicated to Solomon, the same construction used with David's name in many psalm titles. Many scholars date the writing centuries later because of parallels with other ancient love poetry and features of later Hebrew. Honestly, we do not know who held the pen, and the meaning of the book does not depend on it.
Because God thinks faithful love between two people is good and worth singing about. The Bible does not treat the body or desire as shameful, and this book says so in poetry. Ancient readers also valued it because the prophets already pictured God's covenant with His people as a marriage. In the Mishnah, Rabbi Akiva defended the book as the holiest of the sacred writings. It belongs in Scripture both for what it says plainly and for what it echoes.
The woman says it to the young women of Jerusalem three times, in 2:7, 3:5 and 8:4. It means love has its own timing and should not be stirred up or forced before it is ready. She is not ashamed of desire. She celebrates it for the whole book. Her warning is about timing and the covenant that holds love safely, not about shame. It should never be used to make young people feel their bodies or feelings are dirty.
Not in the sense of a hidden code in every line. The plain meaning is a love poem about a woman and a man. But the whole Bible uses faithful marriage as a picture of God's covenant love, and Paul says marriage points to Christ and the church. So when you read that love is strong as death and many waters cannot quench it, it is right to think of Jesus, whose love went into death and was not overcome by it.